Mandariini
Featured essay · Language · April 2025
Chinese writing has traditionally been filed under "logographic" or "ideographic", categories that fail to capture how the script actually works. This essay argues for a phonosemantic reading of the script and examines what that changes for teaching, classification and digital representation.
Bùjiàn, "components": recurring graphemic elements that combine spatially and participate in phonetic and semantic structure.
jú · mandarin orange
Character in focus
A tree that also carries information about how its name is pronounced: 木 places 橘 in a semantic field, while 矞 participates in its phonetic history. Their functions arise through combination, position and historical change.
Character structure, historical phonology, classical grammar, naming, and the relation between written and spoken forms.
Ritual, family, literature, food, popular media and public discourse, examined through concrete historical and contemporary material.
Institutions, political language, cultural transmission, and arguments about continuity and change from early inscriptions to the present.
From the essays
When Chinese writing first emerges in the archaeological record, it already exhibits the essential characteristics of a complete writing system.
Reconceptualizing Chinese Writing, № 01
About the editor
Doctoral researcher · University of Helsinki
Mandariini is written and edited by Toni Kulmala. His research concerns Chinese writing and the history of Sinitic languages. The essays connect close attention to sources, character structure, historical language and contemporary public claims.